← Home
What your power costs — and how fast it's climbing
Every state, colored by how much its residential electricity rate has changed. Tap a state for your number, your national rank, and the grid region — and its data-center-driven demand — behind it.
Compare two states head-to-head →Residential rate change since 2019:Falling0–10%10–20%20–35%35%+No data
Fastest-rising residential rates · since 2019
| # | State | Rate | Since '19 | Avg bill |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | District of Columbia | 25.4¢ | +94% | $119 |
| 2 | California | 35.3¢ | +84% | $138 |
| 3 | Maryland | 22.1¢ | +67% | $157 |
| 4 | New York | 29.4¢ | +64% | $141 |
| 5 | Maine | 28.4¢ | +59% | $162 |
| 6 | Ohio | 19.5¢ | +57% | $125 |
| 7 | Illinois | 20.5¢ | +56% | $110 |
| 8 | Pennsylvania | 21.5¢ | +55% | $136 |
| 9 | Delaware | 18.8¢ | +48% | $133 |
| 10 | New Jersey | 23.5¢ | +48% | $110 |
| 11 | Mississippi | 16.8¢ | +48% | $143 |
| 12 | Louisiana | 14.4¢ | +48% | $129 |
| 13 | Washington | 14.4¢ | +47% | $131 |
| 14 | Connecticut | 32.2¢ | +47% | $173 |
| 15 | Hawaii | 46.6¢ | +45% | $222 |
| 16 | Arkansas | 14.2¢ | +45% | $106 |
| 17 | Texas | 17.0¢ | +44% | $144 |
| 18 | Virginia | 17.4¢ | +44% | $130 |
| 19 | Oregon | 15.8¢ | +43% | $118 |
| 20 | North Carolina | 16.3¢ | +42% | $123 |
| 21 | Indiana | 17.9¢ | +42% | $123 |
| 22 | West Virginia | 16.1¢ | +41% | $108 |
| 23 | Alabama | 17.4¢ | +39% | $147 |
| 24 | Kentucky | 15.0¢ | +39% | $122 |
| 25 | Vermont | 24.6¢ | +38% | $120 |
| 26 | Tennessee | 14.9¢ | +37% | $137 |
| 27 | Colorado | 16.5¢ | +36% | $90 |
| 28 | Michigan | 21.4¢ | +36% | $108 |
| 29 | New Hampshire | 27.2¢ | +35% | $148 |
| 30 | Wisconsin | 19.2¢ | +35% | $106 |
| 31 | Massachusetts | 29.4¢ | +34% | $144 |
| 32 | Georgia | 15.4¢ | +32% | $124 |
| 33 | Florida | 15.4¢ | +31% | $141 |
| 34 | South Carolina | 17.1¢ | +31% | $131 |
| 35 | Oklahoma | 13.3¢ | +30% | $101 |
| 36 | Wyoming | 14.7¢ | +30% | $107 |
| 37 | Rhode Island | 28.3¢ | +30% | $145 |
| 38 | Utah | 13.3¢ | +28% | $79 |
| 39 | Idaho | 12.7¢ | +28% | $97 |
| 40 | Missouri | 14.0¢ | +26% | $105 |
| 41 | Minnesota | 16.4¢ | +25% | $103 |
| 42 | Arizona | 15.5¢ | +25% | $128 |
| 43 | South Dakota | 14.5¢ | +24% | $129 |
| 44 | Montana | 13.9¢ | +24% | $109 |
| 45 | Kansas | 15.8¢ | +24% | $100 |
| 46 | Nebraska | 13.3¢ | +22% | $99 |
| 47 | New Mexico | 15.2¢ | +21% | $74 |
| 48 | Alaska | 27.4¢ | +19% | $162 |
| 49 | Nevada | 14.3¢ | +18% | $89 |
| 50 | North Dakota | 12.3¢ | +16% | $120 |
| 51 | Iowa | 13.9¢ | +11% | $92 |
EIA derives a state's "price" as revenue divided by electricity sold — a proxy for the average rate, not a surveyed tariff. Rates rise for several reasons, including fuel costs and grid upgrades, not data centers alone, so this shows correlation, not proof of causation. How this works →